A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS AND USER EXPERIENCE FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE PREDICTION

  • Virdyra Tasril Politeknik Negeri Medan
  • Santi Prayudani Politeknik Negeri Medan
  • J. Prayoga Universitas Dharmawangsa
  • Rahayu Mayang Sari Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Keywords: machine learning, decision tree, random forest, user experience, academic prediction

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of machine learning algorithms and user experience in predicting students’ academic achievement. The research is motivated by the need for prediction systems that are not only highly accurate but also easily interpretable by users. The proposed methodology involved the implementation of two algorithms, namely Decision Tree and Random Forest, using an academic dataset that included grade point average, attendance, and assessment scores. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, while user experience was assessed through the System Usability Scale (SUS) based on a simple user interface. The findings revealed that Random Forest achieved higher predictive accuracy, whereas Decision Tree provided better interpretability and ease of understanding for users. These results indicated a trade-off between model performance and user experience, suggesting that algorithm selection should consider both aspects in order to develop an effective and user-friendly academic prediction system

References

A. Irham, P. Purwanto, and F. Farikhin, “Academic Performance Prediction Using Supervised Learning Algorithms in University Admission,” vol. 9, no. January, pp. 184–194, 2025.

R. A. Saputri and L. Rosnita, “A Random Forest-Based Predictive Model for Student Academic Performance : A Case Study in Indonesian Public High Schools,” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1042–1049, 2025.

L. E. O. Breiman, “Random Forests,” pp. 5–32, 2001.

M. E. S. Simaremare, S. A. Limbong, E. R. Sirait, and C. S. Hasibuan, “on Psychological Test using Machine Learning,” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 486–491, 2023.

R. Wella, A. A. Sandra, and A. E. John, “Machine Learning System for Predicting Student Suitability for University Courses,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 886–895, 2025.

M. Arifin, F. Nugraha, and D. L. Fithri, “Student Performance Classification Using Academic , Socioeconomic , and Digital Behavior Features : A Comparative Study,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 223–239, 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i1.1460.

S. Sallu, “Random Forest Machine Learning Analysis of Generative AI ’ s Impact on Learning Effectiveness in Indonesian Higher Education,” J. Tek. Inform., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 3635–3651, 2025.

R. Ristiawan, “Predicting Student Final Grades Using Random Forest Algorithms and Linear Regression,” J. Sist. Cerdas, vol. 08, no. 03, pp. 441–448, 2025.

D. M. W. Powers, “EVALUATION : FROM PRECISION , RECALL AND F-MEASURE TO ROC , INFORMEDNESS , MARKEDNESS & CORRELATION,” pp. 37–63.

A. H. Hoti, X. Zenuni, M. Hamiti, and J. Ajdari, “User Evaluation of a Machine Learning- Based Student Performance Prediction Platform,” vol. 58, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.2478/orga-2025-00.

W.-C. Choi, C.-T. Lam, P. C.-I. Pang, and A. J. Mendes, “A Systematic Literature Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Interpreting Student Performance Prediction in Computer Science and STEM Education,” in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, in ITiCSE 2025. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, pp. 221–227. doi: 10.1145/3724363.3729027.

V. Tasril, V. Novita, R. S. Riadi, and R. H. T, “Desain Prototipe Pengujian SUS Untuk Peningkatan UX , Branding , dan Pengalaman Digital ‘ ArsitekMedanku ,’” J. Nas. Teknol. Komput., vol. 5, pp. 1002–1014, 2025.

V. Tasril, M. Iqbal, A. S. Dewi, E. E. Syahputra, and A. Suhut, “Usability Testing Kualitas Desain UI Pemahaman Literasi Digital Anak-Anak,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 427–434, 2023.

V. Tasril, J. Prayoga, S. F. Jayusman, U. Usability, H. Design, and U. Dharmawangsa, “USER INTERFACE DAN UJI USABILITY MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN HUMAN-,” J. War. Dharmawangsa, vol. 16, no. July, pp. 371–382, 2022.

A. Abbas, K. Imran, and C.-Y. Ting, “User Experience Design Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, p. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3173289.

J. Li, A. Brar, and N. Roihan, “The use of digital technology to enhance language and literacy skills for Indigenous people: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 2, p. 100035, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100035.

Published
2026-06-30
How to Cite
Tasril, V., Prayudani, S., Prayoga, J., & Mayang Sari, R. (2026). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS AND USER EXPERIENCE FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE PREDICTION. JURTEKSI (jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 12(3), 469 - 476. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v12i3.4534
Section
Articles