VALIDASI BISNIS ARSITEKTUR MODEL MENGGUNAKAN METODE FORMAL (STUDI KASUS: MANUFAKTURING)

Syifa Annastasia, Asti Amalia Nur Fajrilah, Berlian Maulidya Izzati

Abstract


Abstract: Roeleven and Broer reveal that more than 66% of EA programs do not live up to expectations due to a failure to demonstrate sufficient value for the business. Business architecture has an important role to help companies achieve the desired business values. An organization also depends on how well the information provided on each artifact especially in the architectural business phase. That way, failure in business modeling can also have an impact on EA implementationw. Modeling artifacts in a good architectural business phase can help to avoid mistakes from the start, because the quality of the business modeling model will have an impact on the quality of information system design. Therefore, it need to test the quality of the model on every artifact in the architectural business, because many business models are not always of high quality. To have a high quality EA, one of them is by identifying a conceptual quality framework approach. There are six principles that must be considered when assessing the quality of a company model, in this study using the quality of the business architecture validity model with six attributes using the formal Petri net method.

           
Keywords: Enterprise Architecture; Business Architecture; Business Process; Validity,

Attribute Quality

 

 

Abstrak: Roeleven dan Broer mengungkapkan bahwa lebih dari 66% program EA tidak memenuhi harapan karena kegagalan untuk menunjukkan nilai yang cukup untuk bisnis. Arsitektur bisnis memiliki peran penting untuk membantu perusahaan mencapai nilai bisnis yang diinginkan. Sebuah organisasi juga bergantung pada seberapa baiknya informasi yang diberikan pada setiap artefak terutama pada fase bisnis arsitektur. Dengan begitu kegagalan pemodelan bisnis juga dapat berdampak pada implementasi EA. Memodelkan artefak pada fase bisnis arsitektur yang baik dapat membantu untuk menghindari kesalahan sejak awal karena kualitas model pemodelan bisnis akan berdampak pada kualitas desain sistem informasi. Maka dari itu, kualitas dari pemodelan bisnis model telah diakui sebagai faktor penting untuk pemodelan sukses di perusahaan, serta perlunya untuk melakukan pengujian kualitas model pada setiap artefak pada bisnis arsitektur, karena banyak model bisnis yang tidak selalu berkualitas tinggi. Untuk memiliki EA yang berkualitas tinggi salah satunya dengan mengidentifikasi pendekatan kerangka kualitas konseptual. Terdapat enam prinsip yang harus dipertimbangkan ketika menilai kualitas model perusahaan, dalam kajian ini menggunakan kualitas model validity arsitektur bisnis dengan enam atribut menggunakan metode formal Petri net.

 

Kata kunci: Arsitektur Perusahaan; Bisnis Arsitektur; Proses Bisnis; Validitas; Kualitas Atribut

 

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


T. Tamm, P. B. Seddon, G. Shanks, and P. Reynolds, “How does enterprise architecture add value to organisations?,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 141–168, 2011, doi: 10.17705/1cais.02810.

N. A. A. Bakar, S. Harihodin, and N. Kama, “Enterprise architecture implementation model: Measurement from experts and practitioner perspectives,” Colloq. Inf. Sci. Technol. Cist, vol. 0, pp. 1–6, 2016, doi: 10.1109/CIST.2016.7804849.

Z. R. Putra, A. Rachmadi, and N. Y. Setiawan, “Evaluasi dan Pemodelan Proses Bisnis Menggunakan Business Process Management Notation dan Quality Evaluation Framework ( QEF ) Pada Perusahaan Gumcode Indonesia,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1053–1061, 2019.

L. Retnawati, “Perancangan Enterprise Architecture Menggunakan TOGAF di Universitas ABC,” J. IPTEK, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 13, 2018, doi: 10.31284/j.iptek.2018.v22i1.221.

A. A. Al-ghamdi and F. Saleem, “The Impact of ICT Applications in the Development of Business Architecture of Enterprises,” Int. J. Manag. Stud. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 22–28, 2016, doi: 10.20431/2349-0349.0404005.

I. Moreno-Montes De Oca, M. Snoeck, H. A. Reijers, and A. Rodríguez-Morffi, “A systematic literature review of studies on business process modeling quality,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 58, pp. 187–205, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.011.

F. Timm, S. Hacks, F. Thiede, and D. Hintzpeter, “Towards a quality framework for enterprise architecture models,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 2017, no. November, pp. 14–21, 2017.

A. Queralt and E. Teniente, “Verification and validation of UML conceptual schemas with OCL constraints,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 21, no. 2, 2012, doi: 10.1145/2089116.2089123.

K. M. Van Hee, N. Sidorova, and J. M. Van Der Werf, “Business process modeling using Petri nets,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 7480 LNCS, no. 257129, pp. 116–161, 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-38143-0_4.

Á. Rocha, A. M. Correia, F. B. Tan, and K. A. Stroetmann, “New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, Volume 2,” Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., vol. 276 VOLUME, pp. 63–71, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8.

E. Niemi and S. Pekkola, “Enterprise Architecture quality attributes: A case study,” Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., pp. 3878–3887, 2013, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.201.

R. Khayami, “Qualitative characteristics of enterprise architecture,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1277–1282, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.004.

N. Lim, T. G. Lee, and S. G. Park, “A comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks based on EA quality attributes,” 10th ACIS Conf. Softw. Eng. Artif. Intell. Netw. Parallel/Distributed Comput. SNPD 2009, conjunction with IWEA 2009 WEACR 2009, pp. 283–288, 2009, doi: 10.1109/SNPD.2009.97.

C. Spence and V. Michell, “Experiences of tool-based enterprise modelling as part of architectural change management,” BMSD 2015 - Proc. 5th Int. Symp. Bus. Model. Softw. Des., no. January, pp. 255–260, 2015, doi: 10.5220/0005887902550260.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33330/jurteksi.v7i2.1009

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 36 times
PDF - 18 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.