THE COMPARISON OF WASPAS AND VIKOR METHODS IN ASSESSMENT OF LECTURER PERFORMANCE

Elly Rahayu, Nurul Rahmadani

Abstract


Lecturers are valuable assets in a university, both public and private. A good university must have lecturers who are experts in their fields. Therefore lecturers' evaluation performance needs to be done routinely to make sure lecturers have carried out their duties and responsibilities well. The results of the lecturer performance appraisal are used to consider the leadership to develop the lecturer career.This research aims to compare evaluation performance with the Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizajica I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method. The used method in this study is descriptive with a quantitative approach that is by using numbers in both calculations of the methods. The object of his research is the decision support system for the lecturers' performance evaluation. The results of his research showed that in evaluating the performance of lecturers using the WASPAS and VIKOR methods the same results were obtained for the best ranking, A10, but there were differences in the results for the next ranking.

 

Keywords: Decision Support System; Lecturer; VIKOR; WASPAS


Full Text:

PDF

References


A. H. P. Kusuma, Rina, and A. H. Syam, “The Main Role of Locus of Control and Professional Ethics on Lecturer’s Performance (Indonesian Lecturer Empirical Study),” Int. Rev. Manag. Mark., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 9–17, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aditya_Halim_Perdana_Kusuma/publication/327339720_International_Review_of_Management_and_Marketing_The_Main_Role_of_Locus_of_Control_and_Professional_Ethics_on_Lecturer’s_Performance_Indonesian_Lecturer_Empirical_Study.

Spits Warnars, “Lecturer Decision Support System ( DSS ) based on Indonesian Lecturer Academic position rank Lecturer Decision Support System ( DSS ) based on Indonesian Lecturer Academic Position rank,” 2015, no. September, pp. 7–10, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2119.4721.

K. Elliott, “Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development?,” Aust. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 102–116, 2015, doi: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6.

A. Hakim, “Contribution of Competence Teacher (Pedagogical, Personality, Professional Competence and Social) On the Performance of Learning,” Int. J. Eng. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2015, [Online]. Available: www.theijes.com.

B. Daniawan, “Evaluation of Lecturer Teaching Performance Using AHP and SAW Methods,” bit-Tech, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–39, 2018, doi: 10.32877/bt.v1i2.41.

A. M. Januriana, D. Wiguna, and S. N. Aji, “Recommendations of the Best Lecturers Selection Method Using Simple Additive Weighting ( SAW ) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process ( AHP ) Abstract :,” Int. J. Comput. Tech., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 154–161, 2018.

Mesran, G. Ginting, Suginam, and R. Rahim, “Implementation of Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality ( ELECTRE ) Method in Selecting the Best Lecturer ( Case Study STMIK BUDI DARMA ),” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. (IJERT, vol. 6, no. 02, pp. 141–144, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijert.org/view-pdf/16277/implementation-of-elimination-and-choice-expressing-reality-electre-method-in-selecting-the-best-lecturer-case-study-stmik-budi-darma.

M. Zein and M. Ghalih, “An Evaluation of Lecturer Performance in PoliteknikNegeri Tanah Laut, Indonesia,” Am. Int. J. Bus. Manag. ISSN, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 1–07, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.aijbm.com.

S. Saifulloh, R. Pamungkas, and M. Lenawati, “Decision support system with TOPSIS method for lecturer appraisal in Universitas PGRI Madiun,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1375, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1375/1/012009.

S. Fadli and K. Imtihan, “Implementation of MOORA Method in Evaluating Work Performance of Honorary Teachers,” SinkrOn, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 128, 2019, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v4i1.10192.

S. Sundari, Karmila, M. N. Fadli, D. Hartama, A. P. Windarto, and A. Wanto, “Decision Support System on Selection of Lecturer Research Grant Proposals using Preferences Selection Index,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1255, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1255/1/012006.

S. Musani and A. A. Jemain, “Ranking schools’ academic performance using a fuzzy VIKOR,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 622, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/622/1/012036.

R. M. O. Alguliyev, R. M. Aliguliyev, and R. S. Mahmudova, “Multicriteria Personnel Selection by the Modified Fuzzy VIKOR Method,” Sci. World J., vol. 2015, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/612767.

S. Markani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan PemilihanKetua Prodi Teknik Informatika Menerapkan Metode WASPAS dan VIKOR,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains SAINTEKS 2019 ISBN, pp. 249–262, 2019.

S. Barus, V. M. Sitorus, D. Napitupulu, M. Mesran, and S. Supiyandi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pengangkatan Guru Tetap Menerapkan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–134, 2018, doi: 10.30865/mib.v2i2.594.

M. Handayani and N. Marpaung, “Implementasi Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (Waspas) Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Laboratorium,” Semin. Nas. R. 2018 ISSN 2622-9986 STMIK R. R. ISSN 2622-6510 , vol. 9986, no. September, pp. 253 – 258, 2018.

N. Jain and A. R. Singh, “Supplier Selection in Indian Iron and Steel Industry : An Integrated MCDM Approach,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 20, pp. 455–459, 2018.

R. Tari and F. Harefa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Dosen Komputer Terbaik dengan Menerapkan Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” Ris. Komput., pp. 558–563, 2019.

A. P. U. S. Anis A Trisnani1, Dede U Anwar1, Wulan Ramadhani1, Monica M Manurung2, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Berprestasi Menerapkan Metode Vise Kriterijumska Optimizajica I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. Vol. 5 No., no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.stmik-budidarma.ac.id/index.php/jurikom/article/download/608/577.

D. Siregar et al., “Multi-Attribute Decision Making with VIKOR Method for Any Purpose Decision,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1019, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1019/1/012034.

Onur Önay and B. F. Yıldırım, “Evaluation of NUTS Level 2 Regions of Turkey by TOPSIS, MOORA and VIKOR 1,” Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 212–221, 2016.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33330/icossit.v1i1.686

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1 times
PDF - 10 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.